I don't have fancy studio strobes, but I have very adequate 300 watt monolight units. Just for grins I sometimes set them all to slave and trigger them with the RTF. The RTF is just bright enough to trigger the slaves but not bright enough to affect the lighting. But generally, the RTF is useless. Paul On Sep 15, 2006, at 10:48 AM, graywolf wrote:
> Which is true. You do not want the light from that damn RTF messing up > your careful lighting setup. Most studio photographers are now using > radio sync now. I can not imagine why the put the damn RTF on the > camera > at all, I guess to prove it is not a pro unit. > > -- > graywolf > http://www.graywolfphoto.com > http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf > "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" > ----------------------------------- > > > Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: >> On 15.09.2006, at 12:48 , Carlos Royo wrote: >> >>> I may be keeping some features for an upscale model, to be released >>> next >>> year. >> I don't thnk so. Wireless flash using RTF is good rather for >> amateurs, pro will just buy econd dedicated flash to achieve wireless >> flash capability... >> >> Cheers, >> Sylwek >> >> >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
