I recently got an Epson R220 for my wife & have been thoroughly impressed with it. I paid $99.00 USD for it. I've been using a 1997 Epson Stylus Photo (cost $300 in 97) & was very happy with it. The R220 exhibits less banding than the original Stylus Photo. A full set of replacement inks cost almost as much as the printer itself which comes with all the inks. I don't think you can go wrong if you want a cheap photo quality printer.
Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mat Maessen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: ot: printing on acetate or other clear media with epson 220 > On 9/17/06, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I was winging the settings as there isnt one on the 220 for >> transparancies. > > Not related to your question, but how do you like the 220 for > general-purpose photo printing? I'm thinking I need to kick my 820 to > the curb... > > -Mat > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
