Joseph Tainter wrote:
> I'm back from a few days in Italy--Milan, Venice, Porto Venere. The trip 
> was mainly for a conference in Porto Venere, so there was only a little 
> chance for photography. Because of this I took only a minimal kit--*ist 
> D, DA 21, DA 40, and A 50 F1.2. The DA 21 got a workout, and proved 
> consistently to be a good focal length for architecture and landscapes.
> 
> There were, of course, a lot of people lugging around big, heavy Nikons 
> & Canons, with enormous zoom lenses. I caught several of them glancing 
> at my diminutive D with its tiny DA 21. In Porto Venere I walked past a 
> pro photographing a wedding with a big Canon L lens. Even she glanced at 
> my petite kit.
> 
> I'll never get through all of the back posts on the K10D. I gather there 
> is no indication that it can take replaceable batteries. Bummer. Did we 
> learn which is the killer feature for which Aaron would sell a kidney? 
> Is it the fly paper in the mirror box?
> 
> I'll probably get one, but I'll gripe about some of its specifications, 
> particularly the battery. (I'm not a grip guy, so please don't recommend 
> that.)
> 
> My DA 21 is a tired little pup. I'll have to rest it for a few days.
> 
> Joe
> 

Just a question, but how do you like the DA 40 on digital? They're quite 
cheap here in Canada right now, so I'm considering grabbing one.

-Adam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to