Jens Bladt wrote:
> There's a world of difference.
> The K1000 was a very basic camera. It had what is necassary - nothing more.
> An excellent beginner/student camera. Basic and reliable.
> Not even a DOF preview stop down (Well, I know it did - but
> unintentionally).
> The K10D is loaded with extraordenary features. Two new exposure modes, (or
> is it three), anti dust fuction, shake reduktion and much more.
> Not exactly basic.
> The only thing they have in common - except for the name - is the quite
> moderate price tag. It will probably get the owners a profit for the next
> three years.
> The K1000 was in production for decades. This could never happen again.
> Things change too fast these days.
>
> It would BTW, be very nice to see a basic DSLR without whistles and bells.
> Just an excellent VF, LCD, CCD, meter and buffer. A camera anybody could
> use. A P&S DSLR. At a price tag of - let's say - 250-300 USD. Now, that
> would be a real "K1000D".
K1000D is exactly what I want. But, in my dreams... :((
But, I decided. No fuss with K10D, too big too bulky. K100D is the
camera for me - so I finally ordered one :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], IRC:[EMAIL PROTECTED], /bin/zsh. C|N>K
Linux elanor 2.6.13-15.12-default #1 Thu Aug 24 11:23:58 UTC 2006 x86_64
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
