On Sep 19, 2006, at 10:59 AM, Cotty wrote:

> Of possible interest to note in this thread: TV cameras still use CRTs
> for viewfinders. The LCDs still don't come anywhere close in  
> quality. As
> such, I use an electronic viewfinder (EVF) every day for between  
> one and
> four hours. It's not up to an optical viewfinder, but it's light years
> ahead of still camera EVFs. A friend has an Oly with an EVF and I  
> looked
> down the eyepiece and recoiled in horror. He seemed to think it  
> okay but
> no way could in take that.

The interesting thing is that those tiny CRTs are likely lower  
resolution than the LCD displays, but the high refresh speed and  
crispness make them much nicer on the eye.

Of the EVF cameras I've owne, the Oly C8080WZ had a really poor EVF,  
the Panasonic FZ10 was very low resolution and slow refresh ... birds  
on the wing literally disappeared in the display due to the slow  
refresh and poor resolution although the manual focus resolution was  
not bad with the use of the magnifier ... the Sony F707/717/828 were  
all ok but didn't provide very good manual focusing magnification.  
The R1's is a cut above the other Sonys in that they provide adequate  
magnification on manual focus and the option of 60hz refresh rate  
(still slows down in low light since it's pulling the data off the  
main sensor as fast as it can).

The A2 has so far been the best with both more pixels (at 922,000  
pixels, it's close to 4x the density of the R1), 60hz refresh option,  
and a pretty good magnification option. It also has more user  
configuration options that allow it to work well in poor light  
circumstances.

No EVF can be as responsive as an optical viewfinder, it will always  
take more time to process a raster display than to just transmit and  
bend light, but given enough development to produce more resolution  
and higher refresh rates, they might come to meet the practical needs  
of the optical reflex system in terms of resolution and  
responsiveness while providing some interesting possible advantages  
beyond what can be done with optics alone.

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to