Adam Maas wrote:

> Actually, the E-10 and E-20 were optical viewfinders.

OK, I trust you. I've never been interested in ZLR's and I can be wrong 
here.

> Olympus went form
> traditional SLR's, to fixed zoom SLR's (their film ZLR's), to Digital
> ZLR's (E-10 and E-20) to DSLR's, then experimented with adding EVF
> features to DSLR's (something that many people coming from P&S's ask
> about) and then essentially abandoning the Live Preview idea.
>
> Panasonic has moved steadily towards a real SLR, adding mechanical zoom,
> focus-by-wire and other SLR features, then bringing out a real SLR, and
> ignoring the full-time live preview they could have easily added to the
> DMC-L1 (As it shares a mirror box and finder with the E-330, Panaleica
> could easily have added that feature, but chose not to).

Once again, I just wanted to highlight that CE manufacturers such as Sony 
and Panasonic are (were) the companies you can expect to put together an EVF 
system camera, because of:

1 - Large consumer base oriented companies.

2 - Electronics is their strength.

3 - No SLR culture in their management/design depts.

4 - No film era systems to build on. This is no longer true, since they came 
to rescue of KM and Oly.

5 - Already selling products which are closer to that concept than any other 
camera manufacturer.

I don't expect Pentax to venture in such a project.

This said, I'm not particularly in favor of such a mirrorless camera. Sure I 
don't miss it now.
If someone will do that (and I'm convinced it will happen, sooner or later), 
I'm going to look at pros and cons of such a device when it will surface and 
I can touch and see it. No opinons at this moment.

Dario (who no longer dares to comment about Olympus being afraid to misspell 
its name ;-) 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to