I use Premium Lustre as well. I sometimes print on Velvet Fine Art as well, but Premium Lustre is excellent for most purposes. Paul On Sep 19, 2006, at 7:19 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
> On 9/19/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Scott Loveless wrote: >>> On 9/17/06, Mat Maessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/17/06, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I was winging the settings as there isnt one on the 220 for >>>>> transparancies. >>>> >>>> Not related to your question, but how do you like the 220 for >>>> general-purpose photo printing? I'm thinking I need to kick my >>>> 820 to >>>> the curb... >>>> >>> >>> I have the 320, Mat. Very similar to the 220, same ink. They clog >>> all the time. If we don't print about every three days or so, we >>> have >>> to clean the nozzles (and dump a cubic butt ton of ink in the >>> process). Other than that, I really like the printer. >>> >> >> >> Funny, but my 320 just about never clogs and I don't print alot. >> Great >> output on Premium Luster though. The old C86 has some issues though. >> > Premium Luster is all we use. Christie and I both like it quite a > bit. We tried an Ilford paper (I forget which one) which I thought > was fine. The wife bought some more Premium Luster when the Ilford > ran out. :) > > -- > Scott Loveless > http://www.twosixteen.com > Shoot more film! > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
