K.Takeshita wrote: > On 9/20/06 7:12 PM, "Tim Øsleby", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> DA* 16-50 expected march 2007 >> DA* 50-135 ditto >> > > For the fast zoom, their size look very comfortable, particularly the 16-50. > If one of the larger companies made them, it's going to be huge. > > Ken > >
And indestructible, which is the main reason for the size and weight of the Canikon 2.8 zooms. Compare the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 to the other options. The difference is while the Tamron is well put together, it won't survive bashing about. Personally, I'm willing to give up a bit of build for the ability to carry more in my bag (or conversely, travel lighter). -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
