On 21-Sep-06, at 2:20 PM, Adam Maas wrote: > Scott Loveless wrote: >> On 9/21/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Actually, it makes perfect sense to me. How many normal zooms >>> were in >>> the FA line? People want options there, so they can get the lens >>> they >>> want. You had the FA-J 28-80 (18-55), FA 28-70/4 (16-45), FA* >>> 28-70/2.8 >>> (16-50), FA 28-105 (17-70), FA 24-90 and the FA 28-200. The >>> latter two >>> haven't been replaced yet (Although I don't expect the 24-90 to >>> be, but >>> I do expect a 18-200 at some point). >>> >> >> >> You forgot everyone's favorite: the FA 28-90! > > 28-90? Didn't even know one existed. But if that's a kit lens (and it > looks it) the 18-55 is sortof it's replacement (being not quite as > long).
The 18-55 is about 5 steps up from the 28-90. It's at least got a metal mount... Michael Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michaelhamilton.ca -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
