I haven't heard anything here or elsewhere about the two data feeds to the AD converter. I'm no engineer, but this seemed to be new information in regard to the 22 bit capability. If it's been mentioned here, I missed it. Paul On Sep 23, 2006, at 9:33 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 24/09/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> To me the most important part of this was the explanation of how the >> 22 bit AD converter is utilized. To my knowledge, its benefits are >> explained here for the first time. > > Unfortunately it just sounded to me like someone caught up in their > own marketing, there was no real explanation of merit. In fact I don't > believe that he said anything that hasn't been mentioned or even > dissected and discussed in detail here or at dpreview. It's a bit cute > how marketing is now using the number of seals as a marketing point. > The lack of PC-sync was cited as missing due it being a point of > weakness regarding weather sealing, who knows how they managed to seal > the remote, power and USB/video ports. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
