On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:48:34 +0200, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Lucas Rijnders wrote:
>> Op Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:07:19 +0200 schreef Adam Maas  
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Lucas Rijnders wrote:
>>
>>>> Anything on backward/forward compatibility of the USM and the old AF
>>>> system? Did your rep explain the AF/MF switch on the lenses?
>>
>>> The AF/MF switch on the lens will work just like it does on Canon USM  
>>> or
>>> Nikon AF-S lenses. It's not exactly unique. Does exactly what it looks
>>> like it will do (Allows you to turn off AF on the lens).
>>
>> I am not familiar with Canon or Nikon lenses. Could you explain what the
>> point is, given that you can turn off AF in the body, and that USM (at
>> least the Canon variant) allows manual focus in AF mode?
>>
>> Genuinly interested,
>
> Note that not all USM lenses allow full-time manual focusing.
> Micro-motor USM lenses (all low-end Canon USM lenses as well as the
> Nikkor 18-55 and 55-200) do not allow it, except for the 50 f1.4 USM
> which is clutched like a DA lens (the 50 is only micro-motor USM for
> size reasons, ring-type would make it notably bigger).

I would not expect this solution with Pentax: they have good old in body  
AF for budget lenses...

> The switch on the lens disengages AF in the lens directly, and tells the
> body that it's been done (ensuring nothing bad happens to the motor).
> It's also much more conveniently located than the on-body switch

Depends on what You're used to, I think. On the one EF lens I used (a  
consumer 28-80, and I used it very briefly) I did not find the location  
that handy...

> typically. Note that while USM allows MF override, in AF-S mode it works
> just like the clutched DA/D-FA lenses, you need to let it lock first
> then override.

That's a point. We'll see how it is implemented: two AF/MF switches can  
potentially be great fun for the helpdesk (will it be an AND or an OR  
situation?)

Thanks for the explanation.
-- 
Regards, Lucas


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to