Paul Stenquist wrote: > > I missed the date. That makes them more important. But they're either > very bad scans or grossly underexposed. I would say they're > thematically interesting if not photographically worthy. > I'd like to take another look. I wish people wouldn't clip the url. > Paul
I think they might be some sort of automatic camera that was set up in one or two places... Of the ones I looked at - every one looked pretty dazed or unhappy - I'm guessing they really are related the tone of the Nation after the shooting.. possibly the header "Novermber-December 1963" was a way of not hitting the viewer over the head with it. At any rate, I'd be surprised if there were an actual photographer clicking away on the street... Almost as if it were a surveillance device in a way. ann > On Oct 1, 2006, at 10:20 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > > > Bob Shell wrote: > >> > >> On Oct 1, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > >> > >>> I hate this sort of crap--photographers (especially > >>> sports, it seems) just dumping the contents of their > >>> memory cards on the web, totally unedited. > >> > >> Rick, those were taken in the 1960s! Hardly memory card dumping!! > >> > >> Personally, I thought they were great. > >> > >> Bob > >> > > Me too, Bob > > > > I was wondering if there were specific dates for them - > > November-December 1963 is > > bone chilling to me. Some of the faces seemed to indicate > > a knowledge and reaction to > > the fateful day. > > > > These were a bit tedious to load - ain't got the new > > connection yet - can't wait to go back. > > > > Thanks, Lasse, for posting them > > > > ann > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
