You're correct on the sizes. More negative is always better,  
particularly for landscape photography where detail is critical.  
However, 645 is still a big step up from 35mm.
Paul
On Oct 3, 2006, at 7:46 PM, J and K Messervy wrote:

> Am I right in assuming the 645 frame is 6cm x 4.5 cm while the 67  
> is 6 cm x
> 7 cm?  That makes the 645 nearly square.  Is the 645 inferior due  
> to its
> size?  I'm mainly thinking of landscape shots.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 9:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Pentax medium formats
>
>
>> I went for the 6x7. I figured if I was going to shoot medium format,
>> I'd want the substantially larger negative. I also like the 6x7
>> configuration. The camera is the same shape as a giant 35mm SLR. It
>> feels right in my hands. I have no problem with its size and weight,
>> but I'm a fairly big guy who pumps iron several times a week.
>> Paul
>> On Oct 3, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:14:46 +1000, you wrote:
>>>
>>>> I really want to get a medium format at some point for landscape
>>>> and maybe
>>>> even macro shots.  I keep an eye on Pentax 67 and to a lesser
>>>> extent Pentax
>>>> 645 gear on Ebay.  645 appears to be cheaper on average.
>>>>
>>>> Being a complete medium format ignoramus, can someone please
>>>> explain the
>>>> main differences between the two systems and the pros and cons of
>>>> the two?
>>>
>>> Somewhere I have a list of the advantages and disadvantages of each
>>> system. I'll see if I can dig it up. The short version:
>>> 67 - Larger image size, interchangable finders
>>> 645 - More compact, portable system, newer technology (AF, etc.)
>>>
>>> Both are amongst the most durable cameras ever made.
>>>
>>>> I am no professional, just a hobbyist but would love to have a
>>>> medium format
>>>> for large prints, etc.  I would probably use a mixture of negative
>>>> and slide
>>>> film and use it fairly sparingly.
>>>>
>>>> What should I go for?  What should I look out for?
>>>
>>> Stay away from the pre-MLU (mirror lock-up) 67 cameras.
>>> Not much else to beware of, as far as I know.
>>>
>>>> Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> Both cameras can be had for very low prices these days.
>>>
>>> BTW: Anyone know where I can get a 67-645 lens adaptor? I'm  
>>> thinking I
>>> might want to get some 67 lenses to try on my 645.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to