My 6x7 kit is four lenses -- 55mm, 105mm, 165mm and 300mm. It's  
lighter than my thirteen lens, two body DSLR kit by quite a bit.  
However, I only take the whole kit on critical shoots. Generally, I  
carry two lenses and a camera with 6x7. Three lenses and a camera  
with the DSLR.
Paul
On Oct 3, 2006, at 7:50 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:

> The problem with the 6x7 is not the camera and a lens, its
> When you want to carry a kit of lenses, ( I had 8 ) the bulk
> And weight goes thru the roof.  I sold mine and bought a
> Super Ikona III which is 6x6 folding RF camera that is smaller/lighter
> Than a 35MM SLR!.
> jco
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On  
> Behalf Of
> Paul Stenquist
> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 7:32 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Pentax medium formats
>
> I went for the 6x7. I figured if I was going to shoot medium format,
> I'd want the substantially larger negative. I also like the 6x7
> configuration. The camera is the same shape as a giant 35mm SLR. It
> feels right in my hands. I have no problem with its size and weight,
> but I'm a fairly big guy who pumps iron several times a week.
> Paul
> On Oct 3, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:14:46 +1000, you wrote:
>>
>>> I really want to get a medium format at some point for landscape
>>> and maybe
>>> even macro shots.  I keep an eye on Pentax 67 and to a lesser
>>> extent Pentax
>>> 645 gear on Ebay.  645 appears to be cheaper on average.
>>>
>>> Being a complete medium format ignoramus, can someone please
>>> explain the
>>> main differences between the two systems and the pros and cons of
>>> the two?
>>
>> Somewhere I have a list of the advantages and disadvantages of each
>> system. I'll see if I can dig it up. The short version:
>> 67 - Larger image size, interchangable finders
>> 645 - More compact, portable system, newer technology (AF, etc.)
>>
>> Both are amongst the most durable cameras ever made.
>>
>>> I am no professional, just a hobbyist but would love to have a
>>> medium format
>>> for large prints, etc.  I would probably use a mixture of negative
>>> and slide
>>> film and use it fairly sparingly.
>>>
>>> What should I go for?  What should I look out for?
>>
>> Stay away from the pre-MLU (mirror lock-up) 67 cameras.
>> Not much else to beware of, as far as I know.
>>
>>> Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Both cameras can be had for very low prices these days.
>>
>> BTW: Anyone know where I can get a 67-645 lens adaptor? I'm  
>> thinking I
>> might want to get some 67 lenses to try on my 645.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to