Good luck on the debate and decision. I can only offer this: If you like
manual control and like the basic premise of the SuperProgram, you will
really like the MZ-S. If you like the interface of the Canons, you will
like the PZ-1p better. I think the PZ-1p has a faster, better interface
than the Canons, but the style is very similar. Both are very nice bodies.
Good luck.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 7:13 AM
Subject: Re: MZ-S and 3rd party lenses
> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I have an MZ-S and have shot it quite a bit with a Tokina 28-70 ATX Pro
> II.
> > I haven't noted any problems of any kind. What kind of problems are you
> > seeing?
>
> I don't have an MZ-S so I'm not seeing any problems. I am, however,
debating
> between a PZ-1p and an MZ-S. Often, 3rd party lenses have to be re-chipped
> for new bodies and I was wondering if this was the case with the MZ-S as I
> have a Sigma zoom on the way.
>
> Mark
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
