On 10/4/06, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/4/06, Daniel J. Matyola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The use of the word itself is not so bad. Its use in relation to > > "molested children portraits" is what may have been unintentionally > > offensive to some people. > > I think that summarizes my feelings exactly, Dan. BTW, I brought it > up to Jostein, not because I was in any way offended, but because I > figured that with English not being his first language, he might not > have been aware of the connections that the context might bring up in > the minds of some people.
If it wasn't for the fact I know better (that, and I don't want to offend him) I would swear he was a pom from the way he writes. :-) Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
