Why do you suppose.."it never hit the resolution of the 35mm lenses"?
Only a curiosity, not my characterization. =))

Jack

--- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'd disagree with that characterization. The MF lines that ended up 
> dominating the market (Hassy, Pentax, Mamiya) all are known for being
> 
> quite high resolution and sharp for MF glass. It simply never hit the
> 
> resolution of the 35mm lenses.
> 
> -Adam
> 
> 
> 
> Jack Davis wrote:
> > Image size off-set is, of course, the savior of MF. Interesting to
> > consider that the MF segment wholly accepted lower resolution
> lenses to
> > dominate as a way of increasing profits.
> > 
> > Jack
> > 
> > --- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> >> 35mm lenses are typically of higher resolution in terms of lpmm as
> 
> >> compared to MF lenses. However MF still has higher effective
> >> resolution 
> >> because the increase in negative size is larger than the decrease
> in 
> >> lens resolution. a 25% decrease in lens resolution per mm (pulling
> a 
> >> number out of a hat, based on lens resolution numbers I've seen in
> >> the 
> >> past) is much less notably when the size of the negative is
> increased
> >> by 
> >> 75% or more in each dimension. And that's only the case of 645,
> >> larger 
> >> formats have more notable increases (6x9 for example has more than
> >> 100% 
> >> increase in both dimensions).
> >>
> >> -Adam
> >>
> >>
> >> Jack Davis wrote:
> >>> This may not be true any longer, if it ever was, but 35mm lenses
> >> have
> >>> been tauted as having greater resolving power than MF lenses.
> >> Reason
> >>> that I heard offered many years ago was that wedding
> photographers
> >> used
> >>> mostly MF and they found a "creamy" image more acceptable to the
> >>> customer.
> >>> Lens tests, over the years, seemed to bare out the disparity.
> >>> LF lens resolving power v image size is another matter,
> obviously,
> >> and
> >>> one I'm not even prepared to guess about.
> >>>
> >>> Jack
> >>>
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to