Its very simple exposure compensation to the software. Probably could be written in 10 minutes by one person. And its not even new (earlier film bodies had it ) so That makes it even easier. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 8:38 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The JCO survey ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: The JCO survey > Couple hundred dollars for cam sensor? that's absurd > if anti shake is only $100 retail. $25.00-35.00 retail > is probably a more accurate figure. Cheap! That is one > of the reasons I am so pissed off about it, a key feature > is missing for virtually NO savings in the final cost > of the body. That's dumb. Ummm, no. It's more likely something in the range of 25-35 cost. You are forgetting that they now have to integrate the simulator into the camera's software. Anyway, get over it, life is too short to be continuously pissed off. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
