Hey let's see how long it takes for JCO to hijack this thread! :-)
-- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net J. C. O'Connell wrote: > But why do you claim that the GB is "not a problem" > With KM? see my point? There is no need to give up > The same AE that LX had with ALL pentax K lenses ever > Made. Your "we have DA/FA" makes no sense, what you > Have is brain damage if you cant understand my point > on this. Just because they put out some new ones is > no reason to disable the old ones without good cause > and I don't believe there is one. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Paul Stenquist > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:27 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Stakeout > > That was then. This is now. We have DA and FA lenses. > On Oct 10, 2006, at 9:51 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > > >>Yes, isnt it funny how the same people who say the AE >>Doesn't matter with K/M lenses are the same ones who >>Raved about the fantastic AE in the LX ( which was >>Designed for K/M lenses ) 25 years ago? >>jco >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>Behalf Of >>Digital Image Studio >>Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 8:48 PM >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>Subject: Re: Stakeout >> >>On 11/10/06, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>The original movie is on tonight... Sigh... Pentax LX with action >>>finder.... What a beautiful camera.... ;-) >> >>I was thinking about upgrading one of mine by ripping out the aperture >>feedback mech :-) >> >>-- >>Rob Studdert >>HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA >>Tel +61-2-9554-4110 >>UTC(GMT) +10 Hours >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
