Not me. I wasn't one of them who claimed that. jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Digital Image Studio Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:55 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K100D Anti-shake
On 12/10/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The camera needs to know the focal length of the > Lens to apply the correct magnitude of anti shake > Compensate. It's funny, if you were across the speculation when the in-camera SR was first discussed a year or so back there were quite a few listers who swore that knowledge of FL would not be required to achieve SR :-) -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
