Face it if they removed all the features I don't need or want they would end up with an MX, and if they took the meter out of it I would not cry too loudly. Only I already have a couple of those <grin>.
-- graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" ----------------------------------- J. C. O'Connell wrote: > Don't believe what companies tell you. They lie to > Hide motives. Secondly, I WILL PAY for the feature, > They don't need to reduce the cost of the body, > Especially if its going to remove key features I want. > JCO > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Mark Roberts > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 7:22 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux > > Lon Williamson wrote: > >> On the offhand chance that Pentax peeks at this list, > > Pentax *does* monitor this list (and unfortunately for the aperture > simulator die-hards, they evaluate the credibility of respondents by > their tone as well as the semantic content of their messages) and I > have received private email from someone who actually asked a Pentax > engineer about this issue. The engineer's response was: > > 1) Yes, the aperture simulator *was* eliminated as a cost-reduction > measure > 2) They have no plans to bring it back (based at least partly on the > level of acceptance of the "green button" workaround) > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
