Umm.... Hello! It's another moot question! Samsung bodies are, and will always be, re-named Pentax bodies. They will not produce a unique k-mount body. Stop with the surveys and get a grip.
-- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net Cory Papenfuss wrote: >>Put my name on the aperture arm in a digital camera. If Pentax won't do >>it, perhaps its partner, Samsung, would do it. I would consider a Samsung >>with this feature over a Pentax without it. >> > > > I would to that in a heartbeat. I shoot RAW, and am forced to > shoot in M on my -DS (due to the repeatedly abused subject of > missing aperture simulator) with the bulk of my lenses S/K/M. Most of the > features are useless... so whatever body gives me the best bang for the > buck as this "light-proof box to hold digital film" is the one that I'd > use. > > You do pose an interesting question though. Maybe that would be > another interesting survey... who would buy a Samsung body over a Pentax > body if the only difference was the Samsung had the aperture coupler? How > does brand loyalty affect the "fence sitters" vs. those who are willing to > accept any and all decisions Pentax makes? > > -Cory > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
