It wasn't because of your survey. :-)
Tom C. ----Original Message Follows---- From: Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> Subject: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux - a change to cut downon list traffic Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:54:55 -0400 In order to cut down on list traffic, anyone still wanting to respond should, perhaps, email me privately. I notice old antagonisms developing as a result of my little survey. It was not my intention to provide an arena for that. In a few days I'll present a final summary and a request for any corrections or additions, again asking for an off-list response. I'm hoping, biased as I am, that the results will provide a little incentive for full k-mount compatibility in any future flagship DLSR. My reasons are of course, selfish. When the divorce went through, wifey took all the F/FA stuff and some A lenses and the AF bodies, and I kept all the K/M stuff a few A lenses, and the manual focus bodies. She kept the p-TTL flashes, I got the TTL and manual flashes. I'd like a DLSR, but I'd sure hate to replace all my lenses as long as I can see welll enough to manual focus. But I suspect I'd buy at least a wide AF prime or zoom along with the flagship. My list traffic always shows subscribers email addresses; the one that shows up in my posts is the one to contact me with. Keep those opinions coming, folks. Hopefully off-list. -Lon -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
