I did a quick & simple levels adj & shadow/highlight adj & on you image in 
CS2 - the details really came out.

>When I tweaked cures to bring out more
> detail in the shadow area (especially in the area just
> below and to the right of the peak) it looked plain
> bad to my eye. So, I left it alone.

Well, you were there & know what it looked like in person so I'll defer to 
that.

BTW - what polarizer did you use, what size is it?. I have a rear slip in 
filter ability in my 600 FA, but I've not gotten one due to exorbitant cost 
& limited usage.

Kenneth Waller

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brendan MacRae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 400mm f4 ED (IF)


> Yeah, curves and minus blue.
>
> I hope it's not too dark on your monitor. It looks
> good on mine (mine is also calibrated).
>
> I didn't want to lose the moodiness of the shot. That
> meant letting some of the image stay dark as it is in
> the original. When I tweaked cures to bring out more
> detail in the shdow area (especially in the area just
> below and to the right of the peak) it looked plain
> bad to my eye. So, I left it alone.
>
> -Brendan
>
> --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I too like shooting landscapes with my longer lenses
>> - 300 & 600mm!
>>
>> This image is dark on my calibrated monitor. Details
>> appear to be there but
>> hard to discern.
>>
>> Any adjustment after scanning?
>>
>> Kenneth Waller
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Peter Fairweather" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 400mm f4
>> ED (IF)
>>
>>
>> > On 10/12/06, Brendan MacRae
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Here's one from over the weekend near Convict
>> Lake in
>> >> the eastern Sierras. This is the peak just to the
>> >> south of the lake.
>> >>
>> >> Kodak E100G, I want to say around f8 1/90 sec,
>> MLU. I
>> >> used a polarizer in the rear holder.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.members.aol.com/figgaro/convict.jpg
>> >>
>> >> File size is around 158KB. May slow load on some
>> >> systems.
>> >>
>> >> Comments always welcomed.
>> >>
>> >> -Brendan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> __________________________________________________
>> >> Do You Yahoo!?
>> >> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
>> protection around
>> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> >>
>> > Dear Brendan
>> >
>> > These pages are supposed to be about obsolete
>> equipment, fancy posting
>> > a photo :>)
>> >
>> > Lovely picture, will save up for the lens, might
>> take some time
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Peter
>> >
>> > -- 
>> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to