I'm not familiar with your lens, but early on you said it took rear filters. Is that correct?
The rear filter on my 600 is 43mm. B+H has a rear polarizer for my 600 but the last time I checked they wanted around $250 for it. Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brendan MacRae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 400mm f4 ED (IF) >A 67mm Tiffen. > > -Brendan > > --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> BTW - what polarizer did you use, what size is it?. >> I have a rear slip in >> filter ability in my 600 FA, but I've not gotten >> one >> due to exorbitant cost >> & limited usage. >> >> Inquiring mind wants to know .... >> >> Kenneth Waller >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Brendan MacRae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 400mm f4 >> ED (IF) >> >> >> > Ok. I'll play with it a bit more. >> > >> > -Brendan >> > >> > --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> I did a quick & simple levels adj & >> shadow/highlight >> >> adj & on you image in >> >> CS2 - the details really came out. >> >> >> >> >When I tweaked cures to bring out more >> >> > detail in the shadow area (especially in the >> area >> >> just >> >> > below and to the right of the peak) it looked >> >> plain >> >> > bad to my eye. So, I left it alone. >> >> >> >> Well, you were there & know what it looked like >> in >> >> person so I'll defer to >> >> that. >> >> >> >> BTW - what polarizer did you use, what size is >> it?. >> >> I have a rear slip in >> >> filter ability in my 600 FA, but I've not gotten >> one >> >> due to exorbitant cost >> >> & limited usage. >> >> >> >> Kenneth Waller >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: "Brendan MacRae" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 400mm >> f4 >> >> ED (IF) >> >> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, curves and minus blue. >> >> > >> >> > I hope it's not too dark on your monitor. It >> looks >> >> > good on mine (mine is also calibrated). >> >> > >> >> > I didn't want to lose the moodiness of the >> shot. >> >> That >> >> > meant letting some of the image stay dark as it >> is >> >> in >> >> > the original. When I tweaked cures to bring out >> >> more >> >> > detail in the shdow area (especially in the >> area >> >> just >> >> > below and to the right of the peak) it looked >> >> plain >> >> > bad to my eye. So, I left it alone. >> >> > >> >> > -Brendan >> >> > >> >> > --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> I too like shooting landscapes with my longer >> >> lenses >> >> >> - 300 & 600mm! >> >> >> >> >> >> This image is dark on my calibrated monitor. >> >> Details >> >> >> appear to be there but >> >> >> hard to discern. >> >> >> >> >> >> Any adjustment after scanning? >> >> >> >> >> >> Kenneth Waller >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> >> From: "Peter Fairweather" >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Sample Pic - SMC Pentax M* 67 >> 400mm >> >> f4 >> >> >> ED (IF) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 10/12/06, Brendan MacRae >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Here's one from over the weekend near >> Convict >> >> >> Lake in >> >> >> >> the eastern Sierras. This is the peak just >> to >> >> the >> >> >> >> south of the lake. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Kodak E100G, I want to say around f8 1/90 >> sec, >> >> >> MLU. I >> >> >> >> used a polarizer in the rear holder. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.members.aol.com/figgaro/convict.jpg >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> File size is around 158KB. May slow load on >> >> some >> >> >> >> systems. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Comments always welcomed. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -Brendan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> >> >> >> Do You Yahoo!? >> >> >> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best >> spam >> >> >> protection around >> >> >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >> >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Dear Brendan >> >> >> > >> >> >> > These pages are supposed to be about >> obsolete >> >> >> equipment, fancy posting >> >> >> > a photo :>) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Lovely picture, will save up for the lens, >> >> might >> >> >> take some time >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Peter -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
