I agree impressive results... I think this test shows its potential better than a sharp and not so sharp test would because it shows how much it can actually do. I would like to see it again though at say F8. On 13-Oct-06, at 11:06 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
> On 10/13/06, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Scott Loveless wrote: >>> I walked out the front door, leaned against the porch rail and took >>> these two photos of a sign across the street. K100D, M200/4, f32, >>> 1/10. These are center section crops. >> >> You can't use that lens on that body effectively. Haven't you been >> reading the threads? :-) > > Durn. I forgot about that. Nevermind, then. > >> >>> >>> With: >>> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/ >>> photo#4985380570086965266 >>> >>> Without: >>> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/ >>> photo#4985380566964568082 >>> >> >> Better but still blurry. It IS cool that the AS is functional with >> ANY >> lens. > > Considering that I shot these at f32 and 1/10th of a second, I didn't > really expect either one to be very sharp. I was impressed with the > results, though. > > -- > Scott Loveless > http://www.twosixteen.com > Shoot more film! > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
