I would be, given the fact that there are two very good options for M42 users going digital (Canon and Pentax), including full-frame bodies. The only addition necessary for full M42 support would be the flip-plate for full-aperture viewing and that's not a big loss. (there are far too many different implementations of full-aperture metering on M42 lenses for one to be justifiable to support).
-Adam J. C. O'Connell wrote: > I would not be surpised that someday somebody makes a M42 DSLR > Due to the still tremendous popularity of them particularly the > Pentax SMC Takumars. They are some of the finest handling lenses > That's for sure. > ( not pentax of course ). > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Digital Image Studio > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 1:32 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III) > > On 13/10/06, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I regret having added my name to this silly thread. While I have 10+ >>high quality, old K & M lenses, I know how to use them on my DS >>digital. >> >>So I propose a new survey. Why should we stop at asking Pentax to >>revive the old K & M lenses. Why don't we ask for the old SMC >>screwmount ones too! Surely they could rig something up handle the >>old screwmount actuators. And gee, wow, I've got 10+ high quality old >>SMC screwmount lenses that would fit right on the camera. I can't >>wait to try the SMC 85mm f1.8 screwmount on the next flagship! > > > No, primarily because it's a totally different mount I guess. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
