>It hit me the other day while I was out shooting with my glorious (and, >of late, neglected) Pentax 67: I don't need an MZ-S right now. <snip> Yeah, well that's fine for you... But what all the rest of us who now need a 67 after reading your post?! -- Mark Roberts www.robertstech.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- An equipment epiphany: no MZ-S for me, yet Aaron Reynolds
- Re: An equipment epiphany: no MZ DS for me, yet admin
- Re: An equipment epiphany: no MZ DS for me, ... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: An equipment epiphany: no MZ=2 0 DS f... admin
- Re: An equipment epiphany: no MZ 0 D... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: An equipment epiphany: no MZ-S for me, yet Collin Brendemuehl
- Re: An equipment epiphany: no MZ=2 DS for me,... admin
- Re: An equipment epiphany: no MZ-S for me, ye... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: LX v MX/ME-S (was Re: An equipment ep... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: LX v MX/ME-S (was Re: An equipment ep... Peter Alling
- Re: An equipment epiphany: no MZ-S for me, ye... Joe Urmos
- Re: An equipment epiphany: no MZ-S for me, yet Aaron Reynolds
