No they arent. Where do you come up with this bullshit? When linear stop lenses and electronic communication Were introduced in pentax lenses and bodies, it was Implemented in such a way that none of the KM functions Were affected whatsoever. I.E. The lensmount was still Fully backwards compatable and still is to this day! JCO
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Maas Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 8:42 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux But K/M lenses ARE incompatible with linear aperture stop-down and electronic lens communication. -Adam J. C. O'Connell wrote: > FD/EOS is a stupid analogy because it's the WRONG > Analogy. Cant you understand the difference between > Incompatability and lack of support of something > That isnt incompatble? Obviously not or you wouldn't > Be going on and on about Canon FD/EOS mounts. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > William Robb > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 4:38 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J. C. O'Connell" > Subject: RE: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux > > >> K/M are NOT FULLY SUPPORTED you moron. We are talking about K/M >> Aperture cams, open aperure AE and metering here. Cease and desist >> With your meaning trash posts. I am getting tired of having to >> Reply to this garbage which is exactly what it is. > > So stop replying. > Partial support is still support. > Unlike what Canon FD users went through. > > William Robb > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
