I wouldn't say fail, it depends on your definition of success. After
all it's from the same people who brought us instamatic 126, 110, aps
cartridge and disk film. It was just meant to be redundant in 15-20
years, too bad the digital world moves so much faster.
Digital Image Studio wrote:
>On 14/10/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Didn't Olympus do that with the 4/3? How are they doing?
>>
>>
>
>Maintaining the K mount (to a degree) means that Pentax can crawl back
>to a 36x24mm sensor body if APS sensor line runs out of steam. 4/3 was
>destined to fail from the start (and I think I said as much).
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
