>> The evil part about this is that Mark already has a 645....
>
>A 645 has its uses, and I'd take a 645n over most 35s in an instant, but
>there's no arguing that 67 is bigger than 645.
My feelings exactly. Which is why I got the 645. I can easily go hiking
with the 645, 45/2.8, 75/2.8, 200/4.0, filters, tripod and other supplies;
In other words, I can get into places with a kit which would represent an
impractical load in 67 equivalent.
> Case closed.
I agree ;-)
Hey! You've un-enabled me!
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
