> How anyone can engage in any hand-wringing at all is a mystery to me. It doesn't have an "aperture simulator"
;+} Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: High ISO Images > Doug Brewer wrote: > >>Tell ya what I plan to do. I plan to get hold of the K10D, look it >>over, run it through some field tests, and decide what I like and >>don't like about it. Then I'll decide if what I don't like about it >>outweighs what I do like about it, and go from there. > > Very commendable. > > I have an even simpler plan: I'm just going to buy it. > > There's the increased pixel count > The built-in shake reduction > And the lower minimum ISO > And the faster flash sync > And the bigger, faster buffer > And many other items... > > But basically my reasoning is that there's just no question that it's > going to be better than my ist-D, if for no other reason than it's had > several years of Pentax' (and the industry's) technological advancement > behind it. > > And it's going to cost almost FIVE HUNDRED dollars *less* than my ist-D > did. > > How anyone can engage in any hand-wringing at all is a mystery to me. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
