Well, Paul, maybe I missed something along the way, such as how this thread went from scanning a 6x7 negative to working with RAW files. I know threads morph and discussions wander, I just didn't see any messages to show the transition. Therefore my comment, as it's not possible to scan a negative and then open it in a RAW converter. I agree that his numbers don't add up.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > Date: 10/19/2006 8:40:01 AM > Subject: Re: File size of scanned 6x7 neg > > The RAW converter has everything to do with the subject at hand. > It's impossible to get a 13 x 19, 300 dpi image from a 15 meg file > without interpolation. When you open a digital file in the RAW > converter, you have the option of interpolating to a larger size. Thus, > I asked Bob if that's what he was doing. Otherwise, his numbers don't > add up. No apples and oranges. Just common sense. > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Shel Belinkoff" > > What's this RAW converter got to do with the subject. The discussion was > > about the file size for a scanned 6x7 negative. This isn't a fruit stand > > where we're comparing apples and oranges. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
