He referred to everything you posted, and your prediliction to descend to Ad Hominem attacks when the holes in your argument are pointed out (or even when someone adds an aside you don't agree with, like my using M42 lenses in stop-down mode on M42 bodies)
Was a fairly accurate summation too. Godders does Snark well. -Adam J. C. O'Connell wrote: > He didn't refer to any thing I posted. > If he cant argue the subject matter directly, > He has no business doing the pure bashing > Posts without references. That's wrong. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > William Robb > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 8:40 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J. C. O'Connell" > Subject: RE: The JCO survey > > >> You missed the point as usual. Its >> One thing to call someone stupid >> BASED ON THEIR ARGUMENTS OR STATEMENTS, >> Its another to just do it in a new post >> Without any reference to any previous >> Posts whatsoever which is what he did. >> That's the bullshit. If you cant argue the >> Subject matter and only post pure name calling, you >> Are an obvious "loser" BIGTIME! > > Godfrey WAS calling you stupid based on your arguements and statements. > As you say yourself: > "If you would learn to read and comprehend > ENTIRE thread from the beginning....." > > I do wish you would show some consistency. > > William Robb > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
