If I didn't have to work a bit for my exposure readings, I wouldn't  
be as conscious of what my current settings were. I've found that  
being involved is a good thing.
Paul
On Oct 22, 2006, at 1:59 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:

> And think how much simpler it would be if you didn't have to do that.
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> When I'm shooting with a K lens on my *ist D, my thumb is on the
>> green button. Without really thinking about it, I just keep whacking
>> it as I work. So the shutter speed adjusts continuously as I change
>> the frame or if the light changes. It's really quite simple.
>> Paul
>> On Oct 22, 2006, at 11:45 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> We are not talking about bottom line film
>>> Bodies but most DID show over/under exposure.
>>> Secondly the stop down method is flawed in
>>> That it sucks away meter sensitivity, takes
>>> More time, and needs to be done over and over
>>> Again everytime the lighting changes, the aperture
>>> Setting changes, the varible aperture zoom zoom
>>> Setting changes, and the macro magnification changes.
>>> All of that is continuously fully automatic with the cam sensor
>>> Implementation which is missing on the DSLR with K/M lenses.
>>> jco
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>> Behalf Of
>>> Shel Belinkoff
>>> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 5:44 AM
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: RE: The JCO survey
>>>
>>> No they're not.  Push the GB and the lens and camera communicate,  
>>> the
>>> aperture is recorded and exposure info is calculated, shutter  
>>> speed is
>>> adjusted.  The camera and lens just communicate differently.   
>>> Plus, by
>>> activating the DOF button, the camera provides a read out in the
>>> viewfinder
>>> of how much over/under the exposure is.  That's more than some film
>>> bodies
>>> delivered.
>>>
>>> Shel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> [Original Message]
>>>> From: J. C. O'Connell
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The new bodies are IGNORING lens communication
>>>> Of the K/M lenses. Just because its mechanical
>>>> Doesn't mean its of no value or meaningless.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
>
>                       --Albert Einstein
>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to