William Robb wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J. C. O'Connell" > Subject: RE: The JCO survey > > >> NO, you idiot, I said Canon couldn't >> Carry two incompatible SLR camera systems >> Concurrently. Someones else suggested Minolta >> Did and I stated what happened to Minolta. >> I never suggested Pentax carry two different >> Incompatible SLR systems. They don't even >> Have that. They have new bodies that don't >> Support K/M but K/M are not incompatible. >> Learn to follow the threads correctly >> Or get lost. > > You have also said that camera companies have a responsibility to > support old lenses for a long time. > Why do you keep defending Canon for breaking that rule? > Canon could have kept FD cameras such as the T-90 in production for > quite a while, the demand was certainly there, and they did have this > responsibility to their user base. > Do you know for sure that Minolta went down trying to support the MD > mount? Or was it because they didn't get a DSLR to market soon enough > and lost their user base? > I'm just making comments based on what you are saying, BTW. > > William Robb >
Especially since the T90 was a better camera than they would produce between its discontinuation and the introduction of the EOS-1 several years later. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
