He wanted a lens (or whatever it was). Not hassle, rudeness, and a refund.
Or can't you see that? John On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:43:40 +0100, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just ask him if I offered him a a full refund > Including two way shipping costs? I did. And that > Pretty much will end the story and define who > Is the guilty party. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > John Forbes > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 4:38 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey > > So let's see what was actually written. > > John > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:33:44 +0100, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> See my last post, it's a fucking lie. >> I used no such abusive language or manner >> With him on the ebay deal and went out >> Of my way to see he was treated fairly >> Then he Posts that horseshit? Its incredibly >> Out of line slanderous thing to say >> About anyone considering what I did >> For him on that one. If he stated the whole >> Story it would have been one thing and it >> Would have been very clear that I gave >> Him proper service but he didn't and that's >> The scummy thing about it. I had to defend >> Myself because of his insane, slanderous remarks. >> jco >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of >> John Francis >> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 2:32 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey >> >> >> What's damaging about it, Tom? As far as I can see all that >> Shel did was to suggest that JCOs dispute resolution style was >> to respond with abusive email. Judging by the way he responds >> on this list to anyone who dares to disagree with him I don't >> find that claim in any way unbelievable. >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:26AM -0600, Tom C wrote: >>> I now read all messages from JCO or containing the characters JCO out >> of my >>> junk mail folder. It means I don't have to worry about deleting them >> from >>> the inbox. >>> >>> However, I would be a little torqued as well at this kind of damaging >>> remark, especially when the deal had been consumated to both parties >>> satisfaction. >>> >>> Tom C. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----Original Message Follows---- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey >>> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:02:37 EDT >>> >>> In a message dated 10/24/2006 9:51:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>> JCO is an eBay vendor. Vendor reputations are based not only on the >>> product they sell, but how they deal with customer service issues. If >> a >>> vedor treats his custmers like crap ( I am presuming Shel is being >>> truthful based on JCO's conduct on list), then he has every right > (and >>> perhaps a duty to warn his friends) to tell the world he was badly >>> treated. >>> >>> William Robb >>> ======== >>> Personally, I don't think things shared in private email should be >> shared on >>> list. It's a basic no-no in Net Etiquette. And I know Shel one time >> shared >>> something we had discussed in person, and I thought in private, on >> list, and >>> I >>> didn't appreciate it at all. >>> >>> We are getting along pretty well now, so don't take this too >> personally, >>> Shel. And I don't want to rehash it either. >>> >>> But I think JCO has a perfect right to be thoroughly pissed off. >> Regardless >>> regardless of the content of what was shared privately between them. >>> >>> Marnie aka Doe >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
