I won't shoot you but is it all right if I just say Tsk, tsk, tsk...
Toine wrote: >I got the 16-45 in a kit with the D. It's a great lens. Almost as good >as primes. >Later I got the 18-55 for a bargain price and now I find myself >walking around with the 18-55 because it's also an excellent lens and >it's much smaller. And last but not least because I can use the popup >flash without problems (the popup flash is useless with the 16-45 >below 20 mm). Don't shoot me for using the pop up flash :-) > >Toine > >On 10/26/06, J and K Messervy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>When my K10D finally arrives, I'm trying to decide which lens to get with >>it. >> >>My ist DL came with the Sigma 18-50, so the bar has been set pretty low. >> >>I gather the Pentax 18-55 is quite a bit better. >> >>My question is, is the Pentax 16-45 a big enough improvement over the 18-55 >>to warrent the extra $? >> >>What are the areas where improvement will be noticeable? Sharpness, colour, >>etc? >> >>James >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> > > > -- Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler. --Albert Einstein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
