Uh. Let me think. No:-)) Paul On Oct 27, 2006, at 12:39 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
> You are putting that in your book, aren't you? > > On 10/27/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There is no such thing as an aperture simulator. it's merely a >> reflection of man's inability to accept his shortcomings. Once we >> all learn to accept one another, there will be no need for these >> illusions of an aperture simulator. >> On Oct 27, 2006, at 12:19 AM, Scott Loveless wrote: >> >>> On 10/26/06, Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> If the glass is yellowish at certain angles, is it one of the >>>> radioactive ones? >>>> >>> If your super-tak is a 50/1.4 or a 35/2 then you may have a >>> radioactive lens. Otherwise, the yellow you see at certain angles is >>> probably due to the way the coating reflects yellow light. >>> Interestingly enough, later super-tak 55/2 and 55/1.8 lenses with the >>> aperture simulator lug (here we go again) may actually have SMC. >>> I've >>> read differing opinions on this, so don't take my word for it. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Scott Loveless >>> http://www.twosixteen.com >>> Shoot more film! >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- > Scott Loveless > http://www.twosixteen.com > Shoot more film! > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
