ann sanfedele wrote: > I can't find the scan - it will turn up eventually - but > I have to say no cat was harmed....etc > > I'm thankful Ashley used velvet paws when she paraded across the > screen and the lay down on it. > > I never placed her on the machine - she kept jumping up on it while I was > trying to scan > something. > > It never for a second occured to me it might harm _her_ she was attracted by > the sound it makes. > > I should look for the shot again. it isn't distorted in the way those you > pointed to are.
Kittens are manifestly too wriggly to scan. The other scans were similar to your own. > > thanks for the link - I won't let her do any more photography :) > > ann > > > > mike wilson wrote: > > >>>From: "Mat Maessen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Date: 2006/10/31 Tue AM 03:35:05 GMT >>>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >>>Subject: Re: Test Message from my Cat >>> >>>On 10/30/06, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>>However, in light of this, I feel I must send the list the >>>>self portrait Ashley did of herself on the scanner - I'll >>>>load it and send a link >>> >>>There is an entire website of cat-on-scanner pictures somewhere on the >>>big vastness of the world wide web. I'm not really motivated enough to >>>find it at this point. :-) >>> >> >>It was taken down due to hate mail. There are one or two at the bottom of >>this page. Might be quite big for dialuppers. >>http://members.aol.com/mdserval/catscan.html >> >>----------------------------------------- >>Email sent from www.ntlworld.com >>Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software >>Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
