Bruce, I see what you mean. Due to lighting and resulting contrast, there's no color or detail available in the lower trees. I've dug out another scan and have it up.
Looking forward to comments. Jack http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=202 --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This one doesn't seem quite up to your standards. It could just be > the scan perhaps. The lower trees are all blocked up with no detail > and the contrast seems too extreme - snow blown out on the right and > relatively flat on the left. It has the feel of scanning a print (at > least from my experience). > > Care to enlighten me a little? > > -- > Bruce > > > Monday, November 6, 2006, 8:21:42 AM, you wrote: > > JD> Was making a wallpaper seasonal change and decided to PESO it. > I've not > JD> kept a list of those I've put up, so sure hope this is not a > JD> duplication. > JD> Mt Hood, OR. ME Super, M-28mm f/2.8, film(?). It's on print film > and > JD> I'll be happy to look it up if anyone cares. > > JD> Jack > > JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=201 > > > > > JD> > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > JD> Sponsored Link > > JD> Free Uniden 5.8GHz Phone System with Packet8 Internet Phone > Service > JD> http://www.getpacket8.net/yahoo2 > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near historic lows: $150,000 loan as low as $579/mo. Intro-*Terms https://www2.nextag.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
