Seriously, I would like to have one myself. It could be in the  
future. I'd love to see what kind of images my Summicron 50/2  
produces on a digital sensor. An interesting thought.
Paul
On Nov 7, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:

> Yes, but, how fast is the AF?  :)
>
> Good for you Ryan. I've decided to start an M8 fund, so now all the
> money coming from print or book sales will go towards an M8 and (used)
> 35mm Summicron. Hopefully, I'll get one before the M9 comes out.
>
> Look forward to seeing some pictures from your M8!
>
> j
>
>
> On 11/7/06, Ryan Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just picked up the M8.  First impressions (pictures will have to wait
>> until tomorrow):
>>
>> - Really solid.
>>
>> - Very nice user interface (mechanical and software)... especially  
>> the
>> menus.  Super easy to navigate and work with; everything is very  
>> obvious.
>>
>> - Lowest ISO is 160 (1/8000th top shutter speed)
>>
>> - Highest ISO is 2500.
>>
>> - It's built very, very well- but you can tell that the soul has
>> changed.  When you take the bottom off, it's a digi-cam- no doubt  
>> about it.
>>
>> - Even the LCD has a very high quality anti-reflective coating- looks
>> like the front of a multicoated lens
>>
>>
>> Things to get used to:
>>
>> - Shutter button feels weird to me.  It's just different from the  
>> M7...
>> there are three steps now.
>>
>> - The top of the camera looks empty without the cocking lever.
>>
>> - The Self-timer/C/S/OFF selection switch is too easy to turn  
>> IMHO.  And
>> they should have put single shot all the way on one end instead of  
>> the
>> middle of the stroke.  (if you just slide it all the way on w/o  
>> looking,
>> you get self-timer... you should get single shot IMHO).
>>
>> - With the 1.33x crop, the framelines are different and my brain  
>> doesn't
>> recognize them.  Maybe this is because I'm used to the .8x finder.
>>
>> - Seems slightly fatter and heavier than the M7.
>>
>> - Motor whirring sound after the shot.
>>
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> Gonz wrote:
>>> Its real, or so it would seem, since its now up on DPreview.
>>>
>>> rg
>>>
>>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/14/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> while we're having a love fest on the K10D
>>>>> another "leak" ... in french (babelfish does a good translation)
>>>>>
>>>>>   http://www.macandphoto.com/2006/09/prise_en_main_d.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I think I saw a couple of pigs flying south a few moments  
>>>>> ago ... ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I'll drool anyway.
>>>>
>>>> Even if it's real, I could never afford it, so ontological  
>>>> verity is
>>>> somewhat moot.  <g>
>>>>
>>>> -frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Juan Buhler - http://www.jbuhler.com
> photoblog: http://photoblog.jbuhler.com
> a book: http://www.jbuhler.com/book.html
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to