On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:54:19 -0000, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not even worthy of a response. Nonetheless, it seems to have elicited one. :-) John > > John Forbes wrote: >> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:20:26 -0000, Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> >>> A flagship is a flagship, and if there's a K1D in the future, it >>> should >>> be as >>> complete as the LX was in its day. >>> >> >> Quite right. As complete, not more. I don't recall that the LX mounted >> screw-thread lenses without an adaptor. And I don't recall that the >> adapter was able to stop down the lens when you pressed the shutter. >> >> In other words, the LX provided only partial support for six year-old >> lenses. So why should the K1D provide full support for thirty two-year >> old lenses (assuming it makes its debut in 2007). >> >> John >> >> > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
