Leica, of course. They've been teetering on the edge for quite some time. An M8 failure could be the grand finale. Paul On Nov 10, 2006, at 6:11 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>> >> No wonder they're on the edge of bankruptcy... > Epson or Leica? > > frank theriault wrote: >> On 11/10/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Don't forget the banding issue <LOL> >>> >>> I can understand Frank's comments, although he may have been very >>> strong in >>> his wording to make his point. But I agree - Leica should have >>> been able >>> to produce better results the first time around, but they may >>> have been >>> under pressure to release the camera with less than adequate >>> testing. >>> Still, they've had years to work on this. At one point Leica >>> even said >>> that a digital rangefinder was not even possible, but then the >>> Epson came >>> out - a few years ago. >>> >>> >> >> Well, yeah, like I said, hyperbole to make my point... <LOL> >> >> But, as you said, Epson managed to do it a couple of years ago, and I >> don't know that they had problems with fringing or banding or >> whatever, and it cost a hell of a lot less. >> >> No wonder they're on the edge of bankruptcy... >> >> cheers, >> frank >> >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
