And that is a perfectly understandable view.  I skipped 15 years of  
Pentax development because I hated the plastic AF cameras and lenses  
and my plan was to switch brand when the LX died. It never did, and  
then the Limited lenses and the *istD came.

So I have to conclude that I don´t necessarily disagree with your  
views, just your language. And when the way you phrase an argument  
disturb the way it is understood you have to rethink how you say it.

DagT

Den 11. nov. 2006 kl. 23.49 skrev J. C. O'Connell:

> Thanks for the kind words, I havent been posting
> much as of late because I have been involved much
> more with LF in the last few years and I dont
> think its appropriate to post a lot of stuff about
> that here.
>
> As far as the DSLRS go, I think the K100 is a steal
> and great deal for the price but I am disappointed
> in Pentax overall rescinding their long long time
> stance on backwards compatablity when possible
> and on the K10D , for ita price, I think the
> full K/M support should be offered but isnt.
> That doesnt mean I wont buy a DSLR from them
> ever, but I just don't feel as comfortable with
> the new Pentax as I did with the old Pentax
> with regards to product support/system issues.
>
> jco

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to