Its not a matter of "winning" an argument, its a metter of standing up for right and wrong or true and false. Im not posting to "win", Im posting to set the truth on the matter(s). This list isnt a place for contests. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 1:15 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list? I don't think anyone has to go so far as to filter the threads, although to each their own. I've never filtered anyone, and I'm none the worse for the experience. But it think we all know that there's a point where it doesn't make sense to continue with posts addressed directly to anyone who feels they have to win an argument. I've been guilty of it with several people here over the years, but it's just unproductive. Paul On Nov 12, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > You're probably right, but all I was trying to do was add a little > levity > to the situation. Perhaps in another case the lightness of my post > would > have been seen and appreciated. And that, my friend, is another > aspect of > having discussions with JCO - there's no way to use levity or humor. > > It's probably best for all involved that I just filter every thread > that > involves JCO ... I'm sure it'll be my loss, but there are other > sources of > valuable information available here and on the 'net. > > Shel > > > >> [Original Message] >> From: Paul Stenquist > >> I'm sorry, but this is unnecessary provocation. >> >> On Nov 11, 2006, at 11:11 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: >> >>> <ROTFLMAO> What kind of convoluted double-speak is that?! >>> >>> Shel >>> >>> >>> JCO wrote: >>> >>>> I am saying your wrong in the concept >>>> of that reply post of yours. Someone >>>> may think they just disagree but if their concept >>>> is invalid to my contention than thats another >>>> matter altogether and I won't just "let it drop" >>>> because it implies that your post is somehow >>>> a valid rebuttal/opinion when its not if it is >>>> irrelavant to my contention. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
