The lastest thread for example, wasn't.
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 11:50 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list?


But it's frequently opinion. And at some point, gentlemen and  
civilized people have to agree to disagree.
Paul
On Nov 12, 2006, at 11:45 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:

> No, facts are facts sometimes and truth of
> the matter is all I am arguing in some
> cases. It's not always just opinions...
> jco
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> Paul Stenquist
> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 11:23 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list?
>
>
> Unfortunately, truth is often a matter of opinion. And sometimes
> grownups and gentlemen have to agree to disagree.
> Paul
> On Nov 12, 2006, at 10:59 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>
>> Its not a matter of "winning" an argument, its
>> a metter of standing up for right and wrong
>> or true and false. Im not posting to "win",
>> Im posting to set the truth on the matter(s).
>> This list isnt a place for contests.
>> jco
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of
>> Paul Stenquist
>> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 1:15 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list?
>>
>>
>> I don't think anyone has to go so far as to filter the threads,
>> although to each their own.  I've never filtered anyone, and I'm none
>> the worse for the experience. But it think we all know that there's a
>> point where it doesn't make sense to continue with posts addressed
>> directly to anyone who feels they have to win an argument. I've been
>> guilty of it with several people here over the years, but it's just
>> unproductive.
>> Paul
>> On Nov 12, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>>
>>> You're probably right, but all I was trying to do was add a little
>>> levity
>>> to the situation.  Perhaps in another case the lightness of my post
>>> would
>>> have been seen and appreciated.  And that, my friend, is another
>>> aspect of
>>> having discussions with JCO - there's no way to use levity or humor.
>>>
>>> It's probably best for all involved that I just filter every thread
>>> that
>>> involves JCO ... I'm sure it'll be my loss, but there are other
>>> sources of
>>> valuable information available here and on the 'net.
>>>
>>> Shel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> [Original Message]
>>>> From: Paul Stenquist
>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, but this is unnecessary provocation.
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 11, 2006, at 11:11 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> <ROTFLMAO>  What kind of convoluted double-speak is that?!
>>>>>
>>>>> Shel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> JCO wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  I am saying your wrong in the concept
>>>>>> of that reply post of yours. Someone
>>>>>> may think they just disagree but if their concept
>>>>>> is invalid to my contention than thats another
>>>>>> matter altogether and I won't just "let it drop"
>>>>>> because it implies that your post is somehow
>>>>>> a valid rebuttal/opinion when its not if it is
>>>>>> irrelavant to my contention.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to