NO I wont because sometimes you are just plain out WRONG and this is one of those cases so it serves no one to just shut up and a agree we you when I know its simply not true. And I am talking practical reality too, not just some theoretical B.S like you would like have others to believe. Its a cheap shot to just keep saying that your results are real world and mine are not. You and no one else ever found a zoom that wasn't easier to focus at the long end did you? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 6:31 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: RE: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list? ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] RE: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list? > But your anecdotes/tests don't change the fact that > my contention is true. Let's make sure we keep that straight. You too > are in a very small minority if you honestly believe that wide angle > lenses are just as easy to focus as telephotos at the same f-stop > because that is what I have been contending all along. John, your contention isn't germain. The only person debating optical theory is you. Shel noted that in one particular situation, theory and practicality didn't quite mesh. I found the same thing when I tested what he had found. There is no need to be an idealogue about these things. Sometimes what happens in practice doean't jive with what we predict based on theory. It's not a big deal. What I find to be a big deal is your continuously jumping on people because every now and again something happens and is discussed that doesn't fit your theoretical reality. At some point, you can give it a rest. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
