But that is the only thing that keeps it from being just another skyline pic. I found it to be refreshing. Not great, but refreshing. Paul On Nov 14, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Yeah, that was my feeling, too. There is just too little of the > skyline on the bottom and way too much sky. > > -- > Bruce > > > Tuesday, November 14, 2006, 6:34:51 PM, you wrote: > > RW> Adam, > > RW> I don't care for it. Way too much blank space at the > RW> top, and not enough to hold interest at the bottom. > > RW> Rick > > RW> --- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> A slightly trite city skyline shot >>> >>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/296936246/ >>> >>> K100D, 16-45 [EMAIL PROTECTED], 20 seconds at f8 and ISO 200. >>> >>> large version for non-Flickr types: >>> >>> > RW> http://static.flickr.com/103/296936246_cabe325514_b.jpg >>> >>> -Adam >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> > > > RW> http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW > > > > RW> > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________ > RW> Want to start your own business? > RW> Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business. > RW> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
