Coming from the PZ-1p, it took me a while to start to appreciate the MZ-S
for what it is. It is *not* a PZ-1p stripped down some. It reminds me much
more of a Super Program dressed up for modern times. The PZ-1p is great for
all the automatic modes. The MZ-S is angled more toward a manual control
person. Now who's to say one style is more or less professional than the
other. Just different. Both very usable, but not directly comparable.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karasch, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:47 PM
Subject: FW: poor MZ-S review on epinions.com
> Anyone can write a "first impressions" review after 15 minutes, but it
takes
> considerably more time to fully evaluate the pro's and con's of an
> unfamiliar camera. People who write "evaluations" should spend enough
time
> (> 15 minutes) with the manual and the camera to fully understand how it
> works before posting a review. Okay, so maybe the MZ-S manual won't win a
> Nobel Prize for literature, but it does a reasonable job of explaining the
> camera's features. Reviewers should at least have the decency to shoot a
> few rolls of film and look at the results before passing judgment. And
> isn't it boring to see Pentax getting hammered in every review for the 2.5
> FPS frame advance? Who cares?
>
>
> John
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
